Not signed in (Sign In)

LiveSearch

Categories

  • News
  • Everything you need to know.
  • Recurring Events
  • Classes, venues, dances. Anything that swings on a weekly or monthl...
  • Special Events
  • Workshops, exchanges, invitationals, mini-exchanges. Whatever's hap...
  • Out of Town
  • Road trips, exchanges, and anything from anywhere that's not here.
  • Swing Instruction
  • Need to polish a few moves? Need to learn some moves to polish? Che...
  • Dance Talk
  • Music, moves, and inspiration. If it swings, talk about it here.
  • Meet 'n Greet
  • Stop by and introduce yourself. Get to know everyone. Just like a s...
  • [Almost] Anything Goes!
  • If there's life outside of swing, discuss it here.
  • Support
  • Bug reports, feature requests, all that.

Vanilla 1.1.5a is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome Guest!
Want to take part in these discussions? If you have an account, sign in now.
If you don't have an account, apply for one now.
    •  
      CommentAuthort_roach
    • CommentTimeDec 26th 2006
     

    Some people say that "people watching" is their favorite hobby. The many people that put this PBS program together, and I, share a similar hobby: language listening. I'd love to hear what y'all think of the topics discussed on their website.

    As a favorite example, are these statements true or false? Please post your responses before reading on. [Emoticon not found]

    1. 1. There are people who do not speak a dialect.

      2. Some dialects are not grammatical.

      3. People who speak certain dialects do so because they are incapable of learning mainstream Standard English.

      4. Speaking a dialect limits what one is able to express.

      5. They speak really bad English down south and in New York City.

      6. Women talk too much.

    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    Most every peer-reviewed article and textbook I've read (which are also some of the same referenced by this PBS program) on the subject agrees with the following interpretation.

    Americans tend to subscribe to a number of myths about language. A common one is that there are people who do not speak a dialect. Linguists, however, use the terms dialect to refer to any variety of a language, and they point out that it is impossible to speak English without speaking some particular dialect of English. Everyone speaks a dialect—though some are prestigious and some are stigmatized. A second common myth is that some dialects are not grammatical. Linguists use the term grammatical to mean rule-governed and patterned. All dialects are indeed grammatical in this sense, since they each have their own rules of sound and syntax. No dialect is haphazard; all are systematic. A third myth is that people who speak certain dialects do so because they are incapable of learning mainstream Standard English. In fact, dialects persist for many reasons, one of the most important being that ways of speaking are closely bound up with personal identity. Children learn to speak the variety of language that is spoken by the people around them, whether that is Standard English or one of the many vernacular varieties of English. A final myth is that speaking a dialect limits what one is able to express. In fact, many dialects have features that express meanings that are difficult to convey in Standard English.

    Is there something "wrong" with some people's English? Read here.

    For more on female speech, read here.

    I love the way this site presents the debate about Standard American English, "correct" language and self-proclaimed grammar police (and difference between prescriptivists and descriptivists), and the effects of stygmatizing certain dialects (I love this video. If this link doesn't work, you'll find it at the top of this page.).

    How does the socio-linguistic landscape in New York, parallel Utah?

    Guess where these speakers are from.

    •  
      CommentAuthort_roach
    • CommentTimeJan 16th 2007 edited
     

    Dear Bob,

    Here are some simple definitions and examples of the distinction between pidgins, creoles, and dialects.

    This is one example of how Chinese "dialects" from a linguistic perspective are not really dialects, but distinctive languages since many of them are not mutually intelligible.

    Oh and this --

    self-proclaimed grammar police (and difference between prescriptivists and descriptivists), and the effects of stygmatizing certain dialects (I love this video. If this link doesn't work, you'll find it at the top of this page.).

    -- pretty much contains most of the key points of our discussion tonight.

  1.  

    ...so I typed up a response, THEN read what t_roach had to say about it all... Got to say, I felt pretty smart... I haven't read through all the links, but what I did read was very interesting.

    Anyway, my response to the T/F questions:
    "1. False- Some dialects may be more mainstream than others, but since there are so many different ways of speaking the same language, I'd say every variation is a dialect.
    2. True- Assuming by 'grammatical' you mean 'conforming to the published rules of grammar', then I'd say that there are dialects out there in which certain phrases are commonly understood among the speakers of that dialect but are not, strictly speaking, grammatically correct.
    Wait. I just looked up 'dialect', and using the definition here (http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/dialect) then by definition they all have their own grammar structure. So false.
    3. False- As a rule, I don't like blanket statements like that. No, some people just speak that way because they don't have/see a reason to speak any other.
    4. I guess it depends on the dialect, but in general I'd say that language is designed for people to express themeslves to other people, and most dialects should facilitate that just as well as any other.
    5. True and False, depending on who you mean by "they". Some people in the South DO speak really bad english. They aren't clear, they don't know how to express themselves, and talking to them is difficult because you can't understand the words they're saying OR how those words fit together and make sense. On the other hand, some people in the South have an excellent command of the English language. I've met both kinds.
    6. Again, true and false. Some women don't talk enough, and could avoid all kinds of problems if they would just speak up now and then. Some women talk a WHOLE lot, and everyone else (including other women) just wishes they could get a word in edgewise. And, of course, 'too much' is a little subjective for a true/false answer."

    There you go, roach. Feedback. [Emoticon not found]

  2.  

    I found this funny, since I just got done with a linguistics class where we were learning about this in the last month of the semester. On the whole "if women or men dominate the discussions more" idea, I find it ironic that Jamie and I are the 2 to respond so far and give feedback.
    My teacher also commented last semester that in group discussions, there is a socially acceptable amount of time that a silence can go on before it is perceived as someone else's "turn" in the conversation, and that someone can chip in. He told us that a study indicated that the amount of time for women to feel it is acceptable to jump in is longer than the amount of time it is for men to feel it is acceptable, which is why men have a tendency to dominate mixed-group conversations. This seems like a vast oversimplification to me, since I know that a lot of the time, girls will talk over the top of each other in big groups and be perfectly fine with that, but that seems like a specific set of circumstances where you are well acquainted to every member of the group conversing, so maybe the rules don't apply there.
    Anyway, there's my two cents worth.

    •  
      CommentAuthortraci
    • CommentTimeJan 18th 2007
     
    Effervescence:

    On the whole "if women or men dominate the discussions more" idea, I find it ironic that Jamie and I are the 2 to respond so far and give feedback

    just look at the forum stats for more proof that boys like to talk a lot [Emoticon not found]

    •  
      CommentAuthorElChuy
    • CommentTimeJan 18th 2007
     

    [Emoticon not found]

    •  
      CommentAuthorBuzz
    • CommentTimeJan 19th 2007
     
    traci:
    Effervescence:

    On the whole "if women or men dominate the discussions more" idea, I find it ironic that Jamie and I are the 2 to respond so far and give feedback

    just look at the forum stats for more proof that boys like to talk a lot [Emoticon not found]

    Ok... Miss 1500 posts

    •  
      CommentAuthortraci
    • CommentTimeJan 19th 2007
     

    right. but i'm the only girl in the top five. thomas and justin talk WAY more than i do.

    •  
      CommentAuthorElChuy
    • CommentTimeJan 20th 2007
     

    :chewie: :bob:

  3.  

    still though, 1 in 5 is good. right?

    •  
      CommentAuthorBuzz
    • CommentTimeJan 20th 2007
     
    traci:

    right. but i'm the only girl in the top five. thomas and justin talk WAY more than i do.

    And how many gay points do they each have?

    •  
      CommentAuthorbobthecow
    • CommentTimeJan 20th 2007
     
    Buzz:
    traci:

    right. but i'm the only girl in the top five. thomas and justin talk WAY more than i do.

    And how many gay points do they each have?

    watch it. you are only spared gay points because you don't live in the house any more.

  4.  
    bobthecow:
    Buzz:
    traci:

    right. but i'm the only girl in the top five. thomas and justin talk WAY more than i do.

    And how many gay points do they each have?

    watch it. you are only spared gay points because you don't live in the house any more.

    And then there's that whole marriage thing. Real or a cover up?

    •  
      CommentAuthorElChuy
    • CommentTimeJan 21st 2007
     

    It's a front...

    •  
      CommentAuthorBuzz
    • CommentTimeJan 21st 2007
     

    Then I must say, this is the best camouflage I have ever had [Emoticon not found]

  5.  
    Buzz:

    Then I must say, this is the best camouflage I have ever had [Emoticon not found]

    I have nothing to hide, but I wouldn't mind some camouflage like that...

    not yours though.

    •  
      CommentAuthorBuzz
    • CommentTimeJan 22nd 2007
     

    Haha, you are getting better at covering your tracks.

  6.  

    Or maybe I just leave my tracks uncovered sometimes for entertainment purposes?

    I like to think that anyway.

    •  
      CommentAuthort_roach
    • CommentTimeFeb 9th 2007
     

    http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/illegitimate

    What were you saying again, Bob? [Emoticon not found]

    •  
      CommentAuthorbobthecow
    • CommentTimeFeb 9th 2007
     

    i was saying (and still stand by it) that in common usage, illegitimate is seldom used as the opposite of legitimate.

    in law? yes. in offspring? yes. in normal conversation? nope. sorry.

    "that's not a legitimate use of the word."

    vs.

    "that's an illegitimate use of the word."

    [Emoticon not found]

    •  
      CommentAuthort_roach
    • CommentTimeFeb 9th 2007
     

    What was the context last night? I forgot already. I was standing by the oven...

    •  
      CommentAuthortraci
    • CommentTimeFeb 9th 2007
     

    have you tried googling "not a legitimate use" versus "illegitimate use" to see which one is more commonly used? google's an awesome way to see how poeple are using phrases. and if you're a linguistics nerd like me, it's mildly exciting.

    •  
      CommentAuthorElChuy
    • CommentTimeFeb 10th 2007
     
    •  
      CommentAuthorElChuy
    • CommentTimeFeb 10th 2007
     

    The result? "illegitimate use" wins by a landslide... (70,300 to 11,800 results)

  7.  
    •  
      CommentAuthorElChuy
    • CommentTimeFeb 10th 2007
     
  8.  

    dang.

    •  
      CommentAuthorBuzz
    • CommentTimeFeb 11th 2007
     
    •  
      CommentAuthortraci
    • CommentTimeFeb 12th 2007
     
    ElChuy:

    The result? "illegitimate use" wins by a landslide... (70,300 to 11,800 results)

    yeah, but most of the "illegitimate use" results are from formal or legal sources. it seems like "not legitmate" is more common for informal speech, which was justin's whole point.

    •  
      CommentAuthort_roach
    • CommentTimeFeb 12th 2007
     

    ...and combined with the fact that I spend most of my time environed by graduate level jargon... hmm...

  9.  
    Buzz:

    I'm teh coolest, apparently

    Dang. Too bad you can't spel!1

    •  
      CommentAuthorBuzz
    • CommentTimeFeb 14th 2007
     
    popthestack:
    Buzz:

    I'm teh coolest, apparently

    Dang. Too bad you can't spel!1

    Sayz who?

  10.  

    all desent spel chekerz

    •  
      CommentAuthorBuzz
    • CommentTimeFeb 19th 2007
     
    popthestack:

    all desent spel chekerz

    Dat cuz you's spel chekerz workin' for da man.

Add your comments